The March full moon goes by a variety of names, all appropriate in their own way in this month of seasonal transition. Full Worm Moon. Crow Moon. Sap Moon. Even Crust Moon to describe the icy crust that forms on snow overnight after a day of above freezing temperatures. These were the names given by Indian peoples across the country to tonight’s full moon.
Your calendar may show tomorrow the 27th as the date of full, but since the moon is “fullest” around 4 a.m. Wednesday Central time, it will appear slightly fuller tonight than tomorrow, at least for sky watchers in the western hemisphere.
Most of us won’t be able to tell the difference anyway with our eyes; such subtleties are reserved for binocular and telescope users.
I’ll bet you’ve witnessed the famous moon illusion sometime in your life. When near the horizon, the rising or setting moon looks HUGE compared to when it’s higher up in the sky. Our logical self knows the moon can’t really be bigger. Matter of fact, it’s actually very slightly smaller, since we have to look around the curve of the Earth to see it at moonrise.
If you photograph the moon near moonrise and then again when it’s high up and measure its size, you’ll find there’s no difference in diameter.
Generations of philosophers and scientists at least as far back as Aristotle, who believed it was magnified by the thick air near the horizon, have tried to get to the heart of why we see it so. Our best current explanations to explain this persistent illusion are the “relative size” and “oculomotor micropsia/macropsia” theories.
Relative size is easy to understand and based on the perceived size of an object relative to objects near it. Trees and buildings in the nearby distance and sharing the horizon with the moon make it appear larger in our brains.
When the moon ascends higher and is surrounded by a large expanse of empty sky, it appears smaller. Psychologists call it the Ebbinghaus Illusion and it’s all about context.
Take a look at the illustration above and you’ll see what I mean by context. Assuming the relative size explanation is correct, one could perform an interesting test by comparing the moon’s apparent size in a busy setting with lots of visual cues to one viewed across an empty field or open lake. Would the illusion disappear in the latter?
* When you look at the moon and then momentarily converge your eyes to focus on closer objects in the landscape, the moon will appear smaller (micropsia) than it was before. If you then glance back at the distant moon, your eyeballs straighten out and the moon’s apparent size becomes larger (macropsia).
We’ve all seen the afterimage of a camera flash suspended in front of us after getting our picture taken. If you recall, the afterimage looks large against a wall on the other side of the room, but if you were to hold your hand in front of your face, the ghostly flash would appear small.You can simulate a camera flash by staring at a bright light for a minute in a semi-darkened room and then looking away.
Consider trying an experiment described by Don McCreedy, professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, when you’re watching the full moon tonight. Cross your eyes by looking at the bridge of your nose while at the same time paying attention to the moon in front of you. While the moon will be blurred, it should look smaller. Then uncross your eyes and stare at the moon – it will immediately look larger.
Scientists are still working on the ultimate explanation for the moon illusion. For now, it appears to be a combination of both the relative size effect and micropia/macropsia. If you really want to dig into the details, you’ll find much to learn at McCreedy’s Moon Illusion Explained site. To find times when the moon rises for you town tonight, click HERE.
Have fun and don’t get your eyes stuck